Emissions trading needs technology investment
Monday, 14 April 2008
By Trevor Evans

Establishment of an emissions trading scheme without appropriate investment in new technologies will threaten Australia’s economic health.

Advanced technology, accompanied by behavioural change, can provide the major solutions needed to achieve a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions but, without this advance in technology, emissions targets and trading will drive investment away.

Measures must be adopted to strongly encourage investment in new and improved technology that will reduce carbon dioxide releases to atmosphere and improve energy efficiency.

The Garnaut Climate Change Review Interim Report observes that stringent emissions targets and trading will need to be complemented by commitments by high-income countries “to finance climate-related public goods, with a particular focus on development of new technologies”.

Without such investment, stringent targets will be impossible to meet efficiently with currently available technologies, and this will result in a reduction in the level of economic activity in Australia.

Imposing targets without providing assistance to develop the enabling technologies to achieve them could have the unintended consequences of closing down energy intensive industries in Australia and seeing investment migrate to more lenient regimes.

We must have a rapid uptake of low-emissions technologies in conjunction with emission reduction targets and we need urgent action to develop much of the necessary technology in Australia, with consequent economic benefits.

Any emissions trading scheme must be underpinned “by measures to correct market failures or weaknesses related to innovation, research and development. Full commercial scale deployment is also critical.

The Interim Report identifies significant market failures relating to innovation in low- emission energy technologies and suggests the largest market failure is in the incentives to build the first few full-scale commercial plants. Significant government support will be needed to reduce early mover risks and costs in this area.

Australia will need to canvas the full suite of relevant technology domains to optimise its adaptation to climate change, including:

Energy conservation – There is scope for dramatically enhanced energy conservation in industry, commerce and the domestic sector. Promising technologies such as advanced variable-speed motors; sophisticated intelligent control systems; advanced building design, services and materials; and smart lighting systems could provide energy savings of 30-40 per cent with no loss of functionality. Incentives are needed to accelerate the adoption of these measures. The potential of advanced lower-carbon-footprint metallurgical processes is also considerable.

Clean coal technologies – More rapid development of ‘clean coal’ technologies is needed, including improved combustion systems, but especially carbon capture and sequestration. Should these technologies prove successful they will inevitably add significantly to electricity price (even without carbon trading).

Solar energy – Significantly improved less-costly solar panels for integrated roofing systems would enable homes to become distributed micro power stations (at say 2-3kW each). Solar water heating should be required for new houses. Low cost concentrating systems, both photovoltaic and thermal, are needed. Australia is a world leader in silicon photovoltaic technology and this should be our prime focus.

Nuclear energy – Removal of barriers to nuclear energy in Australia would require enhanced public information, as well as education and training of engineers, technologists and managers. Our present nuclear capabilities are very limited. The present political impasse may be overcome as the low-emissions benefits become more apparent and the risks are perceived to be manageable.

Other energy sources – There are significant opportunities for geothermal power generation in Australia, but significant investment is needed. Lower-cost, higher-power wind systems are needed, together with improved predictive models for siting and estimation of output. More research is required in the development of the hydrogen economy, including low-cost hydrogen storage and advanced hydrogen fuel cells.

Electric vehicles – Transport emissions can be lowered by accelerating the take-up of electric vehicles, moving quickly to plug in (and feed out) electric vehicles with advanced batteries and superior performance.

Dr Trevor Evans is CEO of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.


Editor's Note: This article was developed from the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering’s (ATSE) submission in response to the Garnaut Climate Change Review Interim Report. For permission to reproduce this opinion please contact the This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .
Comments (3)
written by Christina Macpherson , April 15, 2008
I'm intrigued to read here - amongst the otherwise sound and sensible thrust of this article - that "the present political impasse (on nuclear power) may be overcome".

I don't think so. I note that the phrase "low emissions" is now being adopted - rather than "clean" or "renewaable" - regarding technologies.
This sort of new spin on nuclear power has apparently not confused the youth of Australia - seeing that the young leaders going to the Prime minister's Summit have clearly rejected nuclear power.
I'm always amazed at the ability of engineers, in particular, to just ignore the nuclear aspects of health, environment, waste disposal, weapons proliferation, terrorism risks, and of course, the astronomic costs to be paid by present and furure generations.
Alas, it seems that engineers either lack imagination - or visualise more jobs for them - or both.
Darned if I know, but I doubt that they'll sell nuclear to the rest of us. Christina Macpherson www.antinuclear.net
written by John , April 15, 2008
Unfortunately the key to Global Warming is reducing demand for electricity. With Australian price at around 14 cents per KWhr and Europe around 0.60 Euro or say A$1 per kwhr, there is a lot of scope to increase prices. Why? Carbon will be priced on an internationally fungible basis so electricity generation costs will increase. Australia will benefit as the higher price will result in more money going to CCS/Carbon Sequestration and we will become leaders in the world in this technique without sacrificing coal industry. With even a doubling of electricity price, Clean coal/Carbon capture will work economically. So forget nuclear and focus on coal technology ..best route for Australia
written by Richard Hancock , April 15, 2008
Not all engineers are lacking in imagination, or ignore any aspects of alternative energy sources. The Society for Sustainability and Environmental Engineering focuses on just these sort of issues.

Whatever your opinion of engineers, any solution to global warming will be implemented by engineers.
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.

busy
 
         Add to Google Reader or Homepage RSS Feeds           Email Alerts